[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Lisa Rein <lisarein@finetuning.com>
- To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 15:13:29 -0700
peter murray rust wrote:
>
> As I have often
> (probably boringly) said, I think my community is far more interested in
> semantic than syntactic validity. (Actually they probably don't care about
> either much...)
How can you possibly have one without the other? If your syntax is
bogus -- you won't get far with semantics. How can you?
Am I wrong? Somebody please set me straight.
lisa rein
http://www.finetuning.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
