[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 14:12:24 -0400
Dean Roddey writes:
> It seems that mixing up namespaces and DTDs/Schemas is
> incorrect. DTDs and Schemas would *use* namespaces, but a namespace
> itself should be just a namespace, shouldn't it? Making a
> namespace and a DTD/Schema one and the same means that the tags in
> that namespace could only be used in a document that matched that
> DTD/Schema, which obviously would not be optimal for very open
> ended sets of tags.
Absolutely correct -- the XML WG came to the same conclusion.
Although the schema mechanism is not yet defined, it will certainly be
possible to have a many-to-many relationship among schemas and
namespaces. I can write my own structural schema that happens to use
names from the TEI and Docbook namespaces, but arranged according to
my own requirements (i.e. this is a TEI paragraph, but I'm allowing it
only here).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|