[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tyler Baker <tyler@infinet.com>
- To: Don Park <donpark@quake.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 20:50:22 -0400
Don Park wrote:
> David,
>
> It might be a Good Thing (tm by Tyler) to setup a SAX Service Directory
Hehe... I suppose all you would really need here is to have a web server that
indexes the JAR files (or other binary container format for other languages) of
every parser.
> Server. This way, any SAX client can find the latest and the greatest SAX
> parser over the Net.
>
Another idea that has come to mind is moving the SAX directory structure from:
org.xml.sax
to:
org.xml.sax.parser
Things like standard output APIs may have some claim to being put in a standard
namespace like org.xml.sax For the sake of flexibility, perhaps moving SAX to a
sub-package may be best in the long run. SAX stands for Simple API for XML.
Right now this seems to only apply for parsers, but I think the next step may be
for formatters to be standardized as well.
Tyler
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|