[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 14:28:05 -0400
Andrew Bunner writes:
> <stating-the-obvious>Java Script engines are not easy things to
> write.</stating-the-obvious> I think it's unlikely that developers
> are going to redefine the Java Script language to interpret < as
> < ... my opinion (hope) is that the standard should accomodate
> this.
The problem is that the HTML 4.0 DTD defines the <SCRIPT> element as
follows:
<!ELEMENT SCRIPT - - CDATA>
This is perfectly legal SGML, and HTML 4.0 is based on SGML. It would
actually be *wrong* to use < and & in a <SCRIPT> element in
HTML -- the browsers, probably by accident, have it right (at least
this far).
Here's the crux, though: HTML 4.0 is based on a non-XML subset of
SGML. That means that XML cannot represent (and was never intended to
represent) an HTML <= 4.0 document. It's just wrong. If you need to
do that, why bother with XML when there are perfectly good HTML/SGML
tools out there?
XML is *not* an extension of HTML, and there is no safe way to include
XML in an HTML <= 4.0 page (except by reference, using a <LINK>
element or something similar).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|