[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 21:13:08 +0200
John Cowan wrote:
> Ron Bourret wrote:
>
> > [1] XSchemaPI ::= '<?xschema' S XSchemaID S? '?>'
>
> Why the funky lower case? "XSchema" here as elsewhere.
I started with XSchema and then thought xschema was easier to type (says he who
proposed mixed case element names). I'll change it.
> Also, there can be S after the "<?".
Not true. See production [16] in the XML spec.
> > [2] XSchemaID ::= 'xschema' Eq SystemLiteral
>
> Some provision needs to be made for a PubIdLiteral as well.
I wondered about this. I'll change the xschema in [2] to SYSTEM and add a
production for PUBLIC. Two questions:
1) Are there any conventions in PIs for use/no use of equals signs?
2) Do we always require a system identifier or are the choices system / public /
both?
-- Ron
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|