[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:24:21 +0200
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> But, of course, piggy-backing PIs onto elements using attributes
> is probably always a preferable option, if your PI structure can
> matches the start-tag locations.
Do you mean that instead of using:
<?XSchema SYSTEM="foo.xsc" ?>
<foo>
...
</foo>
we should use something like:
<foo XSchemaSystem="foo.xsc">
...
</foo>
A good idea, but I don't think it will work for us. We accept an arbitrary
number of XSchema PI's, so there is no way to name the attributes.
>
> Even if you use attribute-like syntax, PI values are still just
> text strings, from the XML viewpoint. Having a target (notation)
> to indicate the syntax of the PI is a great headstart in labelling.
I don't understand what you mean. A PI has a target by definition, but I don't
know how this indicates syntax.
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
