Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Ron Bourret)
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 11:24:21 +0200
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> But, of course, piggy-backing PIs onto elements using attributes
> is probably always a preferable option, if your PI structure can
> matches the start-tag locations.
Do you mean that instead of using:
<?XSchema SYSTEM="foo.xsc" ?>
we should use something like:
A good idea, but I don't think it will work for us. We accept an arbitrary
number of XSchema PI's, so there is no way to name the attributes.
> Even if you use attribute-like syntax, PI values are still just
> text strings, from the XML viewpoint. Having a target (notation)
> to indicate the syntax of the PI is a great headstart in labelling.
I don't understand what you mean. A PI has a target by definition, but I don't
know how this indicates syntax.
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)