Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@eng.icl.co.uk>
- To: <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:03:31 +0100
>if you use an attribute-like syntax [for Processing
>then at least you may have a fighting chance that future
>tools will be able to examine them and use them.
>But, of course, piggy-backing PIs onto elements using
>is probably always a preferable option...
That gives me the opportunity to ask a question that's been
bugging me for a while.
I'm designing a document type. Is there any circumstance
when you would advise me to use a Processing Instruction
rather than an empty element with attributes? I can't think
of one myself, but I'm sure the XML designers must have had
something in mind.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)