Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: XML Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 00:26:46
At 11:43 06/10/98 -0400, Tyler Baker wrote:
>John Cowan wrote:
>> I think that to avoid massive confusion this list needs to drop
>> "SOX" immediately and adopt another name, given the appearance of a
>> W3C note called "SOX" (yet another XML schema language).
>How about SEX (Simple Element-Oriented XML). At least it would get the
>of the developer community and probably every cultural commentator as well
Element-Oriented XML is a pleonasm; I'm not sure what XML without elements
would look like :-). I used the term "Element-Oriented Computing" (or
Processing) as an analogy with OOP. The point is that the programming is
mapped onto the elements and for each element there is an
(objected-oriented) chunk of code. An alternative is Element-Object
mapping. I don't claim originality, but it has been a central theme of the
way I have been programming since I started SGML about 4 years ago (with
costwish). It needs a term to describe it as I think it's different from
stylesheet-based programming (DSSSL gurus will probably contest this).
>Seriously, do we really need the S for simple? I mean SAX is simple in
>presents parsed XML data to the application, but working with it is not
>simple as it is a relatively low-level interface.
Well, *I* can use SAX and that sets an upper limit on complexity :-). More
seriously I think it will be extremely important in this discussion to keep
things as simple as possible. I certainly don't understand everything that
has been written on S*X in the last week or so; this is a useful touchstone
for an upper limit.
>Another question is do we really need an anacronymn. Programmers have this
>tendency to describe everything in terms of anacronyms, many of which
>sense as they simply try and satisfy the requirement that an anacronymn be
>to be pronounced in speech.
>Hey I am at a loss of words at the moment for a good name of what was
>called SOX so maybe we should have a contest for the best name here and
I agree (thanks to MurrayM for his mail). It is useful to have a handle for
this concept. Acronyms (sic) are useful. By analogy with XSchema, I'll kick
off with XObject (XML-Objects). I bet it's not novel by now.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)