[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <db@Eng.Sun.COM>
- To: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@boynings.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 11:03:54 -0800
Paul Spencer wrote:
>
> Mind you, I don't think MS is correctly implementing the August 18
> [XSL] draft, but that is another matter, and I could be wrong.
With "xsl:eval", "xsl:script" and many other proprietary extensions,
yet without even "xsl:process-children", I think you're clearly right.
W3C's XSL pattern syntax is there, but not a lot else.
This would have been a good time to use the namespace mechanism, for
example "msxsl:" for those extensions, and "xsl:" for W3C features.
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|