[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 05:53:24 +0000
David Brownell wrote:
>
> Paul Spencer wrote:
> >
> > Mind you, I don't think MS is correctly implementing the August 18
> > [XSL] draft, but that is another matter, and I could be wrong.
>
> With "xsl:eval", "xsl:script" and many other proprietary extensions,
> yet without even "xsl:process-children", I think you're clearly right.
> W3C's XSL pattern syntax is there, but not a lot else.
In fairness to Microsoft, I think it should be pointed out that some of
the differences between what Microsoft has implemented and the Aug 18
draft correspond to changes that have been decided by the XSL WG since
the Aug 18 draft.
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
