[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- To: "xml-dev@ic.ac.uk" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:41:14 +0100
Greetings;
I have a simple question.
What are people doing when they read xml 'over the wire'?. It would appear
that the logical structure of an xml document (to wit
[1] document ::= prolog element Misc*
) is at odds with the protocol specified for things like a http put operation.
For which a response from the recipient cannot come until after the operation
is performed. As a consequence of which, the input socket remain open (being a
two-way stream in order to write the response) after the object has been read.
In which case EOF is not a useful hint that the document is complete.
The same problem will appliy to connections which are kept alive for extended communications.
We could well assert a specific document structure, - for example prescribing
miscellaneous content after the document element, but i'm wondering what the
general W3 intent was.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|