Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: <email@example.com>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 07:39:06 -0500 (EST)
Tim Bray writes:
> At 03:44 PM 12/4/98 -0000, Michael Kay wrote:
> >Author it in XML definitely. What I would do with it then, given that this
> >is a static manual, is to generate HTML at publication time and store the
> >generated HTML on the server in the normal way. That's heresy to many on
> >this list
> Really? Seems like good sound practice to me, at this point in history.
> Also then you can use one of the free full-text packages to search the
> generated HTML and do lots of other neat tricks, too. -Tim
I'm with Tim -- XML is a standard, not a religion. There are three
good reasons to use XML:
1. A solid business and technological case for XML over the other
2. Experimental research.
3. Pure aesthetic joy.
I use XML for #3, but I insist that my customers use it only for #1 or
#2; if not, there is the danger of
which is the technological equivalent of deficit spending.
All the best,
David Megginson email@example.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)