Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David LeBlanc <email@example.com>
- To: Tim Bray <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 11:36:16 -0800
Thank you for your response.
I understand that only DTDs have official standing and that DCD and XSchema
(and others) are only submissions/proposals to W3C. What i'm asking, is it
the intent that, in the fullness of time, one of these will supplant DTDs
as a document type notation?
At 09:16 AM 1/17/99 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 09:42 PM 1/16/99 -0800, David LeBlanc wrote:
>>Are these going to be complimentary or is one of them going to supplement
>>eiither or both of the others?
>At the moment, only DTD has any official standing. All those other
>things are submissions and proposals; the W3C has a process under way
>to sort them all out and propose a next-gen schema facility. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)