Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: james anderson <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 18:10:52 +0100
Don Park wrote:
> >First, we will need to define a new type, namely Name.
> Turning names into first class objects does solve the namespace problem as
> well as providing an opportunity to solve the 'intern' problem by adding
> name comparison methods. Implementations that maintains 'interned' name
> within Name
For which application domains is it necessary to intern the string itself?
Have "cross-namespace" name comparisons turned out to be significant enough to
make this "second level" interning pay off?
> will obviously be very efficient past the tree building process.
Doesn't the "first level" intern of the name object suffice?
> It is not a very well known fact that Docuverse DOM SDK uses 'interned'
> names and it has been very useful to many of our customers although it does
> cost about 10% speed penalty during tree building.
It would be interesting to hear if any of them use functions which include the
prefix among thir arguments and, if so, what for? Perhaps there's something
peculiar about our approach, but 100% of our coding has been in terms of the
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)