Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "XML List" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 19:04:49 +0200
Bill la Forge <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Then to raise again a previous suggestion from Don, we could simply extend
>functionality of the Parser.setDocumentHandler method by checking to see if
>lexical processor interface is implemented. And again, for non-Java
>the DocumentHandler interface should implement an isInstanceOf method.
Ugh. What's wrong with adding setLexicalHandler? feel free to give the same
object both to it and to setDocumentHandler. Or, if the two are _that_
close, add a getLexicalHandler method to the DocumentHandler interface; it
could return null, 'this', or anything you want. I'd argue that in this case
its better to simply add the events to the DocumentHandler interface; the
BaseHandler will define them to a no-op anyway.
There's no need to rely on 'instanceOf' kludges.
Share & Enjoy,
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)