Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Sean Mc Grath <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 20:20:20 +0000
>Biron,Paul V wrote:
>> Actually, it is very easy to generate a Word '97 document which when saved
>> as HTML will be non-wellformed. Try the following, where *xxx* means "make
>> xxx bold", and _yyy_ means "make yyy italicized".
>> This is *a test _of the* emergency_ broadcast system
>> The relevant portion of the HTML produced by word is
>> <P>This is <B>a test <I>of the</B> emergency</I> broadcast
>Un*censored*believable. This not only isn't XML, it isn't even
>HTML. What were they thinking of? (I know, I know: $$$$.)
>Microsoft folks, is there any hope of getting this fixed for
RTF doesn't map well to XML -- even very low level -- formatting
oriented XML -- because of the way RTF is structured.
It is stack based and allows structures to overlap:-
\b1 bold \i1 bold italic \b0 italic \i0 plain
Matching up the on/offs:-
<b> bold <i> bold italic </b> italic </i> plain
invalid XML (or indeed SGML) because of the overlaps.
This kind of overlapping structure is nasty to
do in XML/SGML. (Which is a real pity because it
crops up in some important areas -- looseleaf
publishing for example.)
SGML made a stab at it with an optional feature
called CONCUR (never implemented to my knowledge).
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)