[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David LeBlanc <whisper@accessone.com>
- To: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:57:37 -0800
It's that the generations are so damned fast is a big part of the problem
imho.
Quality of thought and implementation have given way to the product and
"mind share" cycles of Madison Ave (i.e. the marketers).
What's the incentive to make net stuff conforming? The bits get moved no
matter what the form and it's the receivers that have to adapt (read:
kludge) their software to cope with the semi-sortof markup they get.
Dave LeBlanc
At 01:39 PM 1/21/99 -0600, Robin Cover wrote:
<snip>
>Come to think of it: why should this be "Un*censored*believable"
>given that 99% of Net stuff is illegal HTML, despite a couple
>generations (years) of HTML DTDs?
>
>-rcc
>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
