[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:38:56 -0500
At 07:27 PM 1/26/99 +0100, james anderson wrote:
>i suspect i stand in a (very small) minority on this issue, but with respect
>to the diagram (http://www.simonstl.com/articles/layering/layered2.gif.) the
>"namespace transformation" should appear at least above "attribute
>defaulting". i fear i stand in an even smaller minority on the second claim -
>that it belongs above entity resolution. perhaps not in the current spec, but
>time will tell.
You certainly could put it above attribute defaulting if you liked; part of
what I'm proposing is putting that kind of control in the hands of the
application developer rather than the parser author. Personally, I use
attribute defaults for most of my namespace declarations, but your
situation may definitely vary.
Time will certainly tell. Hopefully, it will be merciful.
Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (March)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|