[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: MikeDacon@aol.com
- To: david@megginson.com
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 17:58:22 EST
Hi David,
In a message dated 3/8/99 5:38:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
david@megginson.com writes:
> Think of the URI a statement of ownership. Assume that my ISP is
> host.net, and that I've been allocated 5MB of web space at
> http://host.net/foo/.
>
This is the primary reason I disagree with using a URI.
A feature is not a resource. Also, a standard interface to a set
of features is not the place to invoke ownership priviledges.
You can't own a feature that you expect others to implement.
Unless I am not getting your idea of a feature, your logic seems
incorrect.
Interesting discussion and process (well worth it),
- Mike (mdaconta@aol.com)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
