[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- To: "len bullard" <cbullard@hiwaay.net>, "Jarle Stabell" <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:40:00 -0500
From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
>Darn. Maybe LISP was the right language after all and forty years
>of computer scientists just didn't "get it".
Lisp and XML have a few things in common, like being easy to
determine if they are well formed. Frankly, I think XML will be
better in the long run because it can be validated against various
schema.
Bill
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
