[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- To: "John Cowan" <cowan@locke.ccil.org>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:58:46 -0500
This would force the use of fully qualified names and create
name conflicts for programmers used to simply importing
the classes being used.
I try hard to avoid such potential name conflicts and would prefer
XParser, ExParser, Parser2, ModParser, OpenParser, or anything else
over Parser.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
Date: Saturday, March 13, 1999 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Are we ready to resolve the Mod??SAX name?
>Bill la Forge scripsit:
>>
>> Should we just stick with ModSAX/ModParser?
>> Should we change to OpenSAX/OpenParser?
>
>I support OpenSAX/Parser, in other words keeping the names of the
>classes and interfaces the same, and changing the package name only.
>
>--
>John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
> e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
>
>xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
>Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
>To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>(un)subscribe xml-dev
>To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
>subscribe xml-dev-digest
>List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
