[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:50:19 +0100
John Cowan wrote:
> Chris Lilley scripsit:
> > Wow. So, what this RFC says is that, when used in email and on HTTP, the
> > encoding declaration is *always ignored*.
>
> Unfortunately this is a side effect of the rules for the media type
> "text/*", which says that the default value of "charset" is always US-ASCII.
> The alternative is to use "application/xml", which has no such
> obnoxious rule.
So, in consequence: example file such as the Chinese XML examples at
http://xml.ascc.net/xml/test/index.html (where each example is available
in
UTF-8, Big5 and GB2312, all correctly labelled in the XML encoding
declaration) are now sets of invalid XML files which are required to
produce a critical error because of the invalid byte sequences in what
is now described as a US-ASCII file?
This is deeply counterproductive, and could have been avoided.
--
Chris
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
