Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <email@example.com>
- To: "'Ronald Bourret'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "'XML Developers' List'" <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:12:39 -0500
> > Gavin summed it up quite well - the author used a CDATA Section and
> > may have attached some semantic meaning to it (I know that several
> > people disagree that CDATA sections can have semantic meaning;
> > others think they can) so the DOM doesn't throw away that
> > distinction, just in case.
> I'm having trouble imagining how a CDATA section can have
> semantic meaning in all but the most abusive ways. (Hmmm, there's a CDATA
> section. Fire up the pizza delivery DLL.) Could you give an example?
Not necessarily a semantic, but certainly an *intent*. The example given
earlier was pretty good. You're writing a tutorial on HTML or some
programming language, and as a convention, and as a convenience, you put
all examples in CDATA sections. This makes it easy to edit *and* easy
to extract your examples.
Like Lauren, I am not saying that think CDATA sections are necessary or not,
simply that some people really do want them.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)