[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: 27 Mar 1999 16:04:36 +0200
* uche ogbuji
|
| Furthermore, I've been thinking of proposing that the SAX2
| interfaces be specified in IDL rather than Java (or at least
| publishing an IDL translatiuon when the interfaces are stabilized),
| and your proposal wouldn't wash in IDL.
Many things in SAX won't wash in IDL, such as the use of the
Java-specific InputStream, Reader and Locale objects.
Also, IDL has a problem in that it's sort of a least common
denominator, and thus leaves out many useful language-specific things.
So you'd probably want to do a manual translation anyway.
If there ever is a published SAX spec I think it should use IDL to be
politically correct and point out potential language-mapping problems.
However, the actual utility of IDL I think is low in this particular
case.
--Lars M.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
