Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com, xml-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:15:49 -0500
I am disappointed that the schema working group decided to extend SGML and
XML's conflation of resource provision (entities) and document structure
constraints. I would be glad to work on an XML instance-syntax resource
provision specification if it would help you to split it off. I am already
experimenting in that direction.
I am not the first to point out that allowing parsed entities to be
specified in a schema is violently incompatible with XML 1.0's notion of
well-formedness. Even were that not the case it seems clear to me that
validating a document and *completing it* are two different steps.
Preumably the document's structure should be complete before validation
begins. Surely now is the right time to correct this 13 year old mistake!
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
And so, in one of history's little ironies, the global triumph of bad
software in the age of the PC was reversed by a surprising combination
of forces: the social transformation initiated by the network, a
long-discarded European theory of political economy, and a small band
of programmers throughout the world mobilized by a single simple idea.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)