Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Chris Lilley <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 19:30:18 +0200
John Cowan wrote:
> Chris Lilley wrote:
> > ISO represents governments, not the international community at large.
> More exactly, it represents national standards bodies, only some
> of which are governmental: ANSI, e.g., is a private U.S. nonprofit.
Right, but each government can only have one of them, is my point.
> > For example. Tibetan is a language, but was not added into ISO 10646
> > because Tibet is ruled by China.
> Do you have evidence for this story?
Yes, sure - the Chinese NB didn't ask for Tibetan to be added, in the
sense that there was no Chinese national character set standard for
Tibetan, and the original 10646 was just a concatenation of existing
national standards, so anyone that wasn't an official "nation" got left
out. I was just picking that as an example, by the way, to illiustrate
the point by analogy about international representation; I don't have a
particular axe to grind here.
> IMHO Tibetan didn't make it into 10646:1993 because it's a hairy
> script, not because of Chinese interference.
I didn't say they interfered; I said that they never asked for it and
there was no-one else to ask for it, either. Actually, the Irish NB
seems to fulfill that role rather nicely nowadays ;-)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)