[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- To: XML Dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:25:59 -0400
Chris Lilley wrote:
> Yes, sure - the Chinese NB didn't ask for Tibetan to be added, in the
> sense that there was no Chinese national character set standard for
> Tibetan, and the original 10646 was just a concatenation of existing
> national standards, so anyone that wasn't an official "nation" got left
> out.
Oh, okay. If you go back to DIS-1 you are quite correct.
> I didn't say they interfered; I said that they never asked for it and
> there was no-one else to ask for it, either. Actually, the Irish NB
> seems to fulfill that role rather nicely nowadays ;-)
Yes. Three cheers for Michael Everson, WG2 Protector of the Weak.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
