[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Stephen Owens" <sowens@csdcorp.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 12:22:11 -0400
Paul,
> -----Original Message-----
> Summary:
>
> I believe that the Web needs a concept of a canonical URL, if it doesn't
> already have one. Retrieving a document or the HEAD for the document
> should describe the canonical URL. I wouldn't mind if the canonical URL
> was a totally unreadable UUID as long as I can take two URLs and figure
> out whether they refer to two things that happen to have the same content
> or actually refer to the SAME THING.
>
Should the identity of the URL be defined by the content of the URL or by
the intent/subject of that content? I ask because the same URL retrieved by
two different browsers could differ wildly based on a server side browser
detect. (Oh it's IE5, I'll send the XML version, Netscape 4, I'll send out
something with layers).
Should they still share a UUID? If not what's the relationship between URLs
and UUIDs?
regards,
Stephen Owens
Corner Software
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
