[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
- To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:45:00 -0400
At 10:42 AM 6/14/1999 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>It is becoming painfully obvious that we need a general-purpose
>packaging mechanism to deliver an arbitrary number of related
>whatevers along with a piece of XML payload. There has been a lot
>of discussion about this around the W3C. It may be the case that
>multipart-mime provides a general solution for this problem (don't
>understand it well enough myself to have an opinion), or perhaps
>we need an XML Packaging Language to use for this purpose. -Tim
I've been wondering about this. Granted the XLink spec still hasn't calmed
down, but this kind of problem seems (to me) to be a good fit for an
extended link group solution. And (not that you suggested this) it doesn't
seem to be something that requires the mandate of a WG, but rather can be a
de-facto informal solution a la SAX(2). Would that work, you think?
=============================================================
John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor,
simpson@polaris.net | but it might as well be.
| -- "Kin" Hubbard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|