[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:27:40 -0700
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> - a stylesheet
> - more stylesheets (because of cascading, or because you only
> believe in one of the stylesheet religions)
> - some related java classes
> - some related COM objects
> - a DTD
> - a set of documents involved in an extended hyperlink group
> - a topic map
> - some graphics
> - some other multimedia resources
> - etc etc etc etc
Me, I go for the "etc"!
Most of those should be overridable ... in an E-Commerce
system, there may be a default stylesheet for a purchase order
issued by someone else, but my company may prefer to present it
differently. And similarly the default classes may be oriented
towards purchasers, rather than suppliers -- and if I work for a
supplier, the default classes would do the wrong thing. (Touches
on the workflow issues someone brought up a while back. Everyone
in a workflow system may work with the same data differently.)
> It is becoming painfully obvious that we need a general-purpose
> packaging mechanism to deliver an arbitrary number of related
> whatevers along with a piece of XML payload.
There are plenty of such mechanisms around. But tools using any
of them seem lacking.
> There has been a lot
> of discussion about this around the W3C. It may be the case that
> multipart-mime provides a general solution for this problem (don't
> understand it well enough myself to have an opinion), or perhaps
> we need an XML Packaging Language to use for this purpose. -Tim
The multipart-related MIME type (RFC 2387) sure seems like it
ought to work, at least for cases where one can rely on a single
MIME object to do the job, like HTTP or E-Mail.
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2387.txt
Multipart-related documents basically let you send a bunch of data
as parts of a MIME object and refer to them internally; you might
have the first part
<!DOCTYPE root SYSTEM "cid:foo.dtd">
<root> ... </root>
and the second part would be "foo.dtd". Similarly for other
resources identified by URI.
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|