[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:03:58 -0400
David Megginson wrote:
>
> That's not what I mean -- creating a data model is tractable, but a
> data model is of questionable value if it's not based on a fairly
> accurate business model, use cases, etc.
I do not see why a data model has any higher requirement for business
models, use cases and so forth than a language like HTML, XLink or XML
namespaces. In fact, I would argue that those languages always have an
implicit data model reflecting implicit use cases and business models. We
can make the data model explicit without making the use models explicit.
Isn't that essentially what the information set is doing?
--
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
[Woody Allen on Hollywood in "Annie Hall"]
Annie: "It's so clean down here."
Woody: "That's because they don't throw their garbage away. They make
it into television shows."
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|