[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 02:50:15 +1000
From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
>As Paul Prescod has pointed out, however, in both cases the process is
>really iterative: in a bottom-up approach, it's often useful to stop
>and throw together a straw-man architecture to see if what we've done
>so far makes sense together; in a top-down approach, it's often useful
>to stop and throw together some proof-of-concept components, to see if
>there will be any obvious implementation problems
Good point. (In my book I point out that) Maler and el Anderloussi's
method
is top-down, then bottom up, with a little middle out. Theirs is the
most
well document formal methodology.
Rick Jelliffe
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
