Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: David Brownell <email@example.com>
- To: XML Dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:36:50 -0700
John Cowan wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > Would, for instance, it always be considered characters because its
> > not just 'accidental whitespace'?
> Yes, indeed. Element content models allow only ordinary whitespace,
> not CDATA-bracketed whitespace. Therefore, nothing can be both
> "ignorable whitespace" and CDATA-bracketed at the same time.
> Clause 3.2.1 makes it clear that whitespace in element-content-model
> elements must match the production S, which a CDATA section does not.
Doesn't make it clear to me! :-)
2.7 sez "CDATA sections may occur anywhere character data may occur",
and in 2.3 there is no restriction that it not appear within a CDATA
section. QED; and a variety of other arguments conclude the same.
For a few historical perspectives (and John, I noticed we have
both maintained consistent positions on this issue :-) see:
And similar posts, mostly that in October 1998; the issue summarizes
(IMHO) as a minor lack of clarity in how CDATA shows up.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)