[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Mike Spreitzer" <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
- To: "'Kurt Donath'" <kurt.donath@lmco.com>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 07:01:10 PDT
> I'm not sure that XSL is the place to enforce constraints
> since it's for
> style. Constraints also probably shouldn't live in the XML document
> since they don't participate in the information space, but
> act upon it.
> Perhaps, in the same way that a document points to a schema
> and a style
> sheet, there should be a pointer to a set of methods that
> would describe
> these constraints or any other operations.
Declarative constraints are what schemas are for! The W3C's XML Schema
Working Group has already accepted as a requirement the ability to put
"application-specific constraints" into schemas (see Structural
requirement 5 in
<http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/NOTE-xml-schema-req-19990215>). Let's not
architect things that are "schema-like" but "not schemas"; let's make
schemas able to say what we need them to say.
Mike
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|