xml-dev - Re: More chaos coming down the pike

["Dave Carlson" <dcarlson@ontogenics.com>]

Mike,
Thanks for your summary.  I would add to your list:

OMG's adopted XMI spec that defines:
    MOF metamodel -> DTD  &  MOF model -> XML
including:
    UML -> DTD  &  UML -> XML

The XMI spec appears to be gaining support of the UML vendors, but I'm also
curious if anyone else is using XMI for other DTD generation activities.
I'm building a UML model for representing business rules, and am
experimenting with generation of a correponding DTD using IBM's XMI toolkit
available on alphaworks.  So far, this approach seems to allow a much better
analysis/design process than "hand-coding" a DTD, or other XML schema.

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
Cc: Mike Spreitzer <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 1999 2:41 AM
Subject: More chaos coming down the pike


> Sun and the OMG are preparing to standardize two more arcs (XML schema
> -> Java and XML schema -> OMG IDL, respectively) in an already large
> and inconsistent graph of data modelling languages.  Below I have a
> very partial listing of data languages and mappings between them.
>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)