[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Braden N . McDaniel" <braden@endoframe.com>
- To: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:11:34 -0400
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 17:53:46 Ann Navarro wrote:
> At 05:50 PM 8/29/99 -0400, Braden N . McDaniel wrote:
>
> >Not the issue. The issue is that it's far too easy to create HTML 4
> >documents that *don't* display correctly in current browsers.
>
> I don't remember that being the issue.
The issue was whether HTML 4.0 is a success, and the ease with which HTML 4.0 documents can be created which implementations can't display correctly is certainly key to analyzing that.
> It's just as easy to create HTML 3.2 documents that don't display either.
Are you really contesting the popularly accepted notion that modern browsers support a greater percentage of HTML 3.2 than of HTML 4.0? While I've never seen a quantitative analysis proving this (nor have I any desire to undertake it myself), my experience authoring HTML certainly suggests it is the case. Your statement above flies in the face of this conventional wisdom.
--
Braden N. McDaniel
braden@endoframe.com
<URI:http://www.endoframe.com>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
