Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 16:00:19 +0100
Ann Navarro wrote:
> Sent: 02 September 1999 15:18
> To: Simon St.Laurent; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: How about over 1,000,000 XHTML Namespace URIs?
> At 10:03 AM 9/2/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >At 09:43 AM 9/2/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
> >><broken record type="OnlyTimeToday">
> >>We're in phase 1, moving existing HTML 4.0 into XML.
> >></broken record>
> >Get Phase 1 wrong, and there may not be any other phases -
> or those phases
> >may be a heck of a lot harder to do.
> What is so much harder to do if next it was said: Now that
> we're nice and
> tidy with XHTML 1.0, we move forward with a single flavor, be
> it <whatever
> one is chosen>, and we modularize that, and extend that?
I agree with the stages - that's why I have been drawing a distinction
between tidyHTML and futureHTML. However, don't you do need to leave the
three legacy formats intact? I'd have thought that any modularisation
and extension has to be to a brand new set of namespaces, not an
evolution of one of the current three.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)