[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 11:28:50 -0400
At 04:00 PM 9/2/99 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>I agree with the stages - that's why I have been drawing a distinction
>between tidyHTML and futureHTML. However, don't you do need to leave the
>three legacy formats intact? I'd have thought that any modularisation
>and extension has to be to a brand new set of namespaces, not an
>evolution of one of the current three.
We have, in XHTML 1.0, which is what we were mandated to do.
However, moving forward from HTML 4.0, which is what the future work in
XHTML does, isn't necessarily bound.
Ann (again, not speaking as to any specific opinion or direction of the Group)
---
Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML
Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
