xml-dev - Re: Fw: Fw: XHTML & Schemas

[Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>]

At 09:22 AM 9/2/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 10:13 AM 9/2/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>>Schemas will certainly impact continuing work, but we're not hinging
>>anything in XHTML 1.0 on them. 
>
>Er, well, actually, from what you've posted earlier, I thought the
>idea that namespaces and schemas map one-to-one was one of the primary
>justifications for the use of 3 namespaces in XHTML.

Well, yes, though from that viewpoint it's not just schemas, but DTDs, or
any other defining mechanism. So -- in that sense, we're not pinned
squarely on schemas. The one to one mapping is just one aspect of the
argument on how many namespaces to use. 

>And for the record, I think the idea that namespaces are in an
>identity relationship with schemas is just hopelessly broken.  But
>that's another debate. 

Yes it is :)

Ann
---

Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)