[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Mark Nutter <mnutter@fore.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 08:14:58 -0400
At 04:24 PM 09/02/99 -0400, you wrote:
>What Simon wants, of course, is the rationale. *What* was the compelling
>argument that made the HTML WG reverse itself on this point, so close
>to PR?
Are we sure there was a (singular) compelling argument? What if the WG
reached its conclusion after a long and convoluted debate (such as the
debate that's been going on here lately)? Supplying a concise rationale
might be a "non-trivial" task, might it not?
I'm trying to avoid taking sides here, but I'm getting a sense that perhaps
conditions might be ripe for the evolution of conspiracy theories that
aren't really accurate or helpful. I've been learning a lot from the
discussion, and I hope the flow of information isn't impeded by anybody
feeling that they have to watch what they say.
Pardon the intrusion, I'll sit back and return to just watching the show
again. Thanks for your patience.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Mark Nutter, <mnutter@fore.com>
Internet Applications Developer
FORE Systems
When birds start perching on the lawn, it's time to mow it.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
