[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- To: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@iedigital.net>, xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 09:30:07 -0400
At 12:22 PM 9/3/99 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>Ann Navarro wrote:
>> However, moving forward from HTML 4.0, which is what the
>> future work in XHTML does, isn't necessarily bound.
>
>I know, but I'm being more specific; won't you have to leave the legacy
>namespaces untouched when you move forward?
Pardon the Friday morning confusion, but ....so?
Have 3 now -- have 1 for modularization (or whatever the result is) --
everyone deals with it.
Just as you'll deal with the namespaces from any other mix-and-match
portion that people will be coming up with.
This really is a non-problem for me. (and yes, I know that is one side of a
very wide gulf)
Ann
---
Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML
Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
