[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 12:16:12 -0700
The only really good reason I see for the confidentiality agreement
that exists in several W3C Working Groups has marketing, public
relations, and politics at its base.
Imagine a lively WG discussion, in which two large member
companies (let's call them A and B) disagree. The rest of the WG
agrees with A and that's what goes into the spec. Maybe B gives in
graciously, maybe B gives in less than graciously, maybe B
doesn't give in at all. Then imagine the minutes are all public, and
everyone can tell everyone else exactly what happened.
The upshot is that some journalist, or maybe a public relations
person in company A, starts making a big thing out of how
company A "won" over company B in this issue. Next thing you
know, company B starts fighting back in public, or refuses to give
in graciously on any issue, or doesn't contribute properly to the
discussions, or leaves the WG.
Could this happen? Yes. I've had journalists call me to talk about
specs such as the DOM or XML, and when I've said that there are
discussions and sometimes companies disagree, I've had
questions such as "tell me when company A won and company B
lost" (no prizes for guessing which companies they were
most concerned with). I've seen articles written about other
standards committees (not in W3C) where the journalist has tried
to make out there is a fight in every small disagreement, and to get
quotes from any participant and twist them to make it look like a
fight. Makes for better press, I guess. Not so great if you're on the
WG involved, trying to get some consensus on sticky technical
issues. That can be hard enough without press articles and PR
problems getting in the way.
So sometimes you need confidentiality, to build trust and a
knowledge that what is said in a WG remains within that WG, so
that people can concentrate on the technical work, and not on the
politics.
Lauren
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|