[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:15:00 +0800
From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
>... Using this technique you can
>decouple the model language used for the message from any model
associated
>with the semantics. This means that it does not matter how the
semantics
>have been defined (XML-Data, RDF, text, etc) you can still use a DTD or
a
>Schema to model your message. To me this gets over the problems that
would
>arise if W3C tried to define formal mechanisms for the linking of
namespace
>URIs to schemas, etc.
To find the schema applicable for a namespace, we should not have
a function:
fetch-resource(namespace-URI)
Instead, there it should go through some service:
get-resource(namespace-URI, namespace-resolver-service-URI,
preferred-syntax, resource-type)
where resource-type could be "syntactic-schema", "semantic-schema",
"documentation", etc.
Rick Jelliffe
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
