[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Miles Sabin <msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk>
- To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 16:57:22 +0100
Simon St.Laurent wrote,
> URNs are an acceptable part of the URI spec, but XML
> processors may have no way to resolve them to actual
> resources. What should a validating parser do when
> confronted by:
>
> <!DOCTYPE myDoc SYSTEM "urn:itsSoObvious">
Exactly the same as what it would do if confronted by
<!DOCTYPE myDoc SYSTEM "http://foo.bar.com/itsSoObvious">
if it had no way of resolving an http URI to an actual
resouce: report an error.
Given that not many XML processors have URN resolution
support at the mo', I guess this means the combination of
URNs for DTDs + validation isn't a very good idea (yet).
Cheers,
Miles
--
Miles Sabin Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230 London, W6 0LJ
msabin@cromwellmedia.co.uk England
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|