xml-dev - Re: A Plea for Schemas

[Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>]

Useful discussion, hope lots of people are reading it.  

"Let a hundred flowers bloom" OK, but let a bunch of different schema
*languages* co-exist?  Aargh, this sounds like it makes life more difficult
than need be.

I share the doubt that a grand unified schema repository will be tractable
to build & maintain.  I also am enthusiasm-challenged because in my (lengthy)
experience with XML and its ancestors, I have only ever seen machine-readable
schemas put to use in one application: namely the use of DTDs in 
hand-authoring XML documents.  Clearly the addition of datatypes and so on
should enable all sorts of other goodies but we are all placing bets on
an as-yet-unrealized future.  So some degree of skepticism is in order.

Note "machine-readable" in the sentence above.  At this point in history,
it's the human-readable part of schemas that seem to me to have the
biggest payoffs, because that's what the programmers read before they
write the code that actually does something useful. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)