|
|
xml-dev
|
|
Last updated: Sun Mar 16 17:12:09 2003
1349 messages (listed by date and indexed by thread) |
Date Index
- XML processing instruction survey,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- RE:Re: [SML] All I know is what I read in the papers. -- Will Rogers,
Vane Lashua
- XFM (or something similar),
Sean McGrath
- [SML]My opinion - Leaving out attributes,
Kent Sievers
- SML and false simplicity,
rev-bob
- ANN: SML-DEV,
Don Park
- SML - an alternative,
Stephen T. Mohr
- [SML]My opinion - SML in general,
Kent Sievers
- RE: A call for reason, another go [SML et al],
Dimitris Dimitriadis
- RE: [SML],
David Carlisle
- SML - a vote against,
John Aldridge
- [SML] Without attrs, you don't need empty elements...,
Joshua E. Smith
- XML for printing?,
sunker
- SAX Validation,
Mark Papiani
- XML-to-Java Tools,
Mark Papiani
- Processing XML. RFC.,
Paul Tchistopolskii
- XML4J EA2 --> Xerces-J 1.0,
Mike Pogue
- (retry) Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Sean McGrath
- Web Architecture,
Robert La Quey
- XML Schema One-day intensive tutorial,
Henry S. Thompson
- XML Database: position papers ?,
Patrice Bonhomme
- [SML] Namespace support,
Joe Lapp
- RE: A call for reason, --somewhat refined--,
Dimitris Dimitriadis
- Re: RSS and WAP - another RSS question,
Oliver Becker
- RE: [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.,
Mark Birbeck
- A call for reason,
Joe Lapp
- [SML] Data Markup Language?,
Joe Lapp
- About SML data model and implication for RDBMS to SML mapping,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.,
Mark Birbeck
- re: [SML] Numeric character references,
rev-bob
- Entities - dec, hex, or both?,
rev-bob
- [SML] Preliminary EBNF v0.2,
Don Park
- [SML] i18n Name support?,
Don Park
- SAX (java) endElement event,
Christopher Devenoges
- About SML and internationalization,
Didier PH Martin
- RSS and WAP,
Sean Mc Grath
- Announce: Weblog Monitor and XML,
Dave Winer
- Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Eric Bohlman
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
John Cowan
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
John Cowan
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
John Cowan
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Tony Graham
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Tony Graham
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
John Cowan
- Re: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
rev-bob
- re: RE: RE: Why no ']]>' in CharData?,
rev-bob
- re: Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
rev-bob
- #2 Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Don Park
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
James Tauber
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Pavel Velikhov
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Clark C. Evans
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Joshua E. Smith
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [SML] Comments ( Whether to support Attribute or not? ),
Paul Tchistopolskii
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Steven R. Newcomb
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Paul Tchistopolskii
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Michael Champion
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Paul Tchistopolskii
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Clark C. Evans
- [SML] Mapping between SML and XML,
Joe Lapp
- RE: [SML] Mapping between SML and XML,
Don Park
- RE: [SML] Mapping between SML and XML,
Joe Lapp
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Sean McGrath
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Joe Lapp
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Fw: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- re: Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
rev-bob
- Re: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Joe Lapp
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Reynolds, Gregg
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Reynolds, Gregg
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Sean McGrath
- RE: [SML] Whether to support Attribute or not?,
Sebastien Sahuc
- New 4Suite mailing list,
uche.ogbuji
- [UseableServerSML+i18n] Preliminary EBNF for UseableServerSML+i18n,
Rick Jelliffe
- Schema support in parsers?,
Leigh Dodds
- AW: SML ?!?,
Schulte, Martin
- SML ?!?,
Sophie MABILAT
- DTDs...,
Sophie MABILAT
- Any conceptual equivalent?,
Robert La Quey
- [SML] Preliminary EBNF for SML,
Don Park
- File Format Conversion Tools?,
Raymond
- What is behind IE v 5.0 ?,
Paul Tchistopolskii
- Re: Handheld computers,
Rick Jelliffe
- XSL Recommendation,
gustaf_larsson
- XML Application Servers,
Matthew Gertner
- Re: XML Application Servers,
Dave Winer
- Re: XML Application Servers,
Mike Williams
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: XML Application Servers,
Sebastien Sahuc
- RE: XML Application Servers,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- RE: XML Application Servers,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- RE: XML Application Servers,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- unsubscribe xml@dlsi.au.es,
Cuenta de correo del Xml
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: DSDs a new schema language supporting XSLT,
Oren Ben-Kiki
- About XML document linkage and Schemas.,
Didier PH Martin
- URI's in namespaces,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- program to restore end tags?,
Sean Chen
- XLink within a DTD ?,
Patrice Bonhomme
- Gates on XML & other stuff,
Tim Bray
- ANNOUNCEMENT: DSD - a new schema notation related to XSLT and CSS,
Nils Klarlund
- Question on Schema/DTD,
adrian_north
- Valid XML document,
Didier PH Martin
- Linking a XML document to its schema,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Julian Reschke
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Jeffrey E. Sussna
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Don Park
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Eric Bohlman
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Don Park
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Julian Reschke
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Don Park
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Julian Reschke
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Don Park
- Re: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
John Aldridge
- Re: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Linking a XML document to its schema,
John Aldridge
- Re: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- RE: Linking a XML document to its schema,
dbowen
- XML documents and Schemas,
Didier PH Martin
- Test,
Didier PH Martin
- XTech 2000: Call for Papers and Tutorials,
David Megginson
- Role of Parser in SAX !!,
Jimson K John
- Namespaces and Well-formedness,
Oliver Becker
- RE: RDF, again,
Mark Birbeck
- W3C XML Linking working group publishes XInclude,
Daniel Veillard
- Still news,
Tim Bray
- Microsoft, XML, and the real specs,
rev-bob
- Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
rev-bob
- Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Michael Champion
- Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Jerome McDonough
- RE: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Don Park
- RE: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: RE: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
rev-bob
- re: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
rev-bob
- RE: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Mark Birbeck
- re: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
rev-bob
- re: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Tim Bray
- re: re: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
rev-bob
- re: re: Re: Why I Hate Palmtops (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Tim Bray
- Software to parse, browse and manipulate DTDs,
Andras Micsik
- What do Biztalk want to acheive?,
Didier PH Martin
- XSLT Processors for C,
Niels Möller
- Canonical XML (was: Re: SGML, XML and SML),
Christopher R. Maden
- [ANNOUNCE] JAXP Specification v1.0 Public Draft 1,
James Duncan Davidson
- How to keep "useless" information with SAX (2?).,
Paul Tchistopolskii
- Re: What do XML consultants actually do?,
Kragen Sitaker
- XML One expert panel now playing on TechNetCast,
KenNorth
- Re:,
Kragen Sitaker
- psgml XML problem,
DuCharme, Robert
- What is a document?,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: What is a document?,
Clark C. Evans
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: What is a document?,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- RE: What is a document?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: What is a document?,
Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM
- RE: What is a document?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: What is a document?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: What is a document?,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: What is a document?,
Mark Birbeck
- New Zvon tutorial - XPath tutorial,
Miloslav Nic
- RE: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (short),
Andy.Bradbury
- If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
Anthony B. Coates
- Re: If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
James Tauber
- Re: If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
Anthony B. Coates
- Re: If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
Colas Nahaboo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
Ron Daniel
- Re: If SAX == lex, then what == yacc?,
Anthony B. Coates
- CGI + perl + XML ?,
Patrice Bonhomme
- MSXML paser,
Ravisekhar_Kopparthi
- Elements or Attributes,
Abhishek Srivastava
- ANNOUNCEMENT: XMLwriter 1.0 is Released,
Chris Howard
- msxsl error,
Wo Chang, x3439
- A Joke?,
Didier PH Martin
- Embrase.. Expand.. Extint..,
Didier PH Martin
- facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long),
Steven R. Newcomb
- Using namespace prefix in attribute values,
Peter Stark
- Funny things about XML gizmos,
Didier PH Martin
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Sean McGrath
- RE: SGML, XML and SML,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Tim Bray
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Kragen Sitaker
- re: Re: SGML, XML and SML,
rev-bob
- re: Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Tim Bray
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: SGML, XML and SML,
Tim Bray
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Nik O
- RE: Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Don Park
- Re: How CAN one facilitate re-use of XML components?,
David Jackson
- Announce: Sixth Edition of XSLT/XPath Tutorial Materials,
G. Ken Holman
- Special characters in XSL pattern strings,
Ben Berck
- About template. part 2,
Didier PH Martin
- Representing Large Tabular Data Blocks,
Mike Mclinn
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
Richard Tobin
- parsing an XML document with comments,
Abhishek Srivastava
- Echo Fields,
Abhishek Srivastava
- About templates,
Didier PH Martin
- RE: The size of the processor is not the issue,
Vane Lashua
- External Parameter Entities for Reuse?,
Barton Stanley
- Re: Why validate? (was Re: Parser compliance),
Robin Cover
- XSL-question,
Marcus.Bernhardson
- What's the current status of SAX2?,
Duffy, Bruce
- Schema Tutorial,
Wang, Dapeng
- Clarification on "Burnt by MSXML.DLL",
Ben Berck
- schemas in use,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: SML: The size of the processor is not the issue,
Sean Mc Grath
- Question on reuse of the XML spec,
Don Park
- XML Standards,
Abhishek Srivastava
- History,
Tim Bray
- Can't subclass ElementNode,
Azly NACRO
- Re: XML Memory Requirements (was Re: Feeling good about SML),
Tim Bray
- SML Article/Essay,
Don Park
- Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...?,
Kragen Sitaker
- Announce: IBM XSL Editor,
Joseph Kesselman (yclept Keshlam)
- Grafting DOM on a C++ XML parser?,
Ben Berck
- DTD Question - PCDATA followed by an optional element,
Norman H. Samuelson
- Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16,
Sean Mc Grath
- Parameter Entity Replacement and the XML 1.0 Grammar,
G. Ken Holman
- re: Parser compliance,
Richard Tobin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Parser compliance,
Tim Bray
- Re: Parser compliance,
Lauren Wood
- Re: Parser compliance,
Richard Lanyon
- Re: Parser compliance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parser compliance,
Marcus Carr
- Re: Parser compliance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parser compliance,
Jerome McDonough
- Re: Parser compliance,
Paul Prescod
- RE: Parser compliance,
Don Park
- Re: Parser compliance,
Len Bullard
- Why validate? (was Re: Parser compliance),
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Why validate? (was Re: Parser compliance),
David Megginson
- Re: Why validate?,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Parser compliance,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Parser compliance,
Robin Cover
- Re: Parser compliance,
Steven R. Newcomb
- Re: Parser compliance,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Parser compliance,
Sean Mc Grath
- Re: Parser compliance,
Cooper, Clark
- Fwd: Announcement of draft-murata-xml-01.txt,
MURATA Makoto
- Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML),
James Tauber
- (My) Feeling About SML,
Leigh Dodds
- Creating XMLDocument,
Anton Schoultz - ePOS
- RE: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Len Bullard
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Matthew Gertner
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
David Megginson
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Len Bullard
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
David Megginson
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Paul Prescod
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Len Bullard
- SGML, XML and SML,
Paul Prescod
- RE: SGML, XML and SML,
Don Park
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Paul Prescod
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Dan Brickley
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Sean McGrath
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Dan Brickley
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Sean McGrath
- Re: SGML, XML and SML,
Paul Prescod
- RDF, again,
David Megginson
- Re: RDF, again,
Paul Prescod
- Re: RDF, again,
Niels Möller
- Re: RDF, again,
Gabe Beged-Dov
- Re: RDF, again,
David Megginson
- XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
Len Bullard
- Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
Matthew Gertner
- Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
Len Bullard
- Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
David Megginson
- Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
Len Bullard
- Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff,
David Megginson
- Re: RDF, again,
Paul Prescod
- Re: RDF, again,
David Megginson
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Steven R. Newcomb
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Vane Lashua
- Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?,
Jon Bosak
- Using XML to make it easier,
Dave Winer
- re: abstraction,
rev-bob
- stop programming, start integrating,
Simon St.Laurent
- Fw: a dying girl's wish,
Henrik
- Is there a Java based SGML to XML conversion tool?,
Russ Reeves
- datatypes and i18n,
Reynolds, Gregg
- W3C releases XPath and XSLT Recommendations,
Daniel Veillard
- Feeling good about SML,
Don Park
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Leigh Dodds
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Sean Mc Grath
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Tim Bray
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Tim Bray
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Sean Mc Grath
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Len Bullard
- re: Parser compliance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parser compliance,
James Duncan Davidson
- RE: Parser compliance,
Mary Brady
- RE: Parser compliance,
Robin Cover
- re: Parser compliance,
Richard Lanyon
- Re: Parser compliance,
James Clark
- Re: Parser compliance,
Richard Lanyon
- Re: Parser compliance,
Niels Möller
- Re: Parser compliance,
David Megginson
- re: Parser compliance,
Sean Mc Grath
- re: Parser compliance,
Sebastian Rahtz
- Re: Parser compliance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parser compliance,
Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Parser compliance,
David Brownell
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Reynolds, Gregg
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Bill dehOra
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Mark Birbeck
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Michael.Orr
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Feeling good about SML,
Tim Bray
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Hunter, David
- RE: Feeling good about SML,
Hunter, David
- (no subject),
Cem Redif
- expat as a shared library,
Brian Hurt
- International booleans proposal (con't),
Arnold, Curt
- International booleans proposal,
Arnold, Curt
- Need a favour - anyone ?,
Yogita Patil
- DTD for rfc822 messages?,
Steven Champeon
- Schematron: Rick Jelliffe interview on xmlhack,
Simon St.Laurent
- Profiling and Packaging XML,
Simon St.Laurent
- No Subject,
srikanth pillalamarri
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- <Possible follow-ups>
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- XML for Data Transfer,
roopa rayaprolu
- ANNOUNCE: XPath interface for XT Version 0.85,
Takuki Kamiya
- Re: HERE's why the world needs a simpler XML! [was Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)],
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Is the XML decl a PI ?,
Tim Bray
- Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Separating documents in a stream,
John Tigue
- RE: APIs vs Markup,
Tim Bray
- UTF-8 space efficiency,
Kragen Sitaker
- documenting schemas/DTDs,
Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
W. Eliot Kimber
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
Tim Bray
- RE: documenting schemas/DTDs,
DuCharme, Robert
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
edwsm
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
Thomas B. Passin
- RE: documenting schemas/DTDs,
Reynolds, Gregg
- Re: documenting schemas/DTDs,
edwsm
- GPS - Groves and Property Sets for Python 0.20,
Geir Ove Grønmo
- default encoding,
Volkmann, Mark
- Good stuff on XHTML modularization,
Tim Bray
- SML and History,
Tim Bray
- XSL Tutorial,
Roger L. Costello
- Need help on converting WML to WBXML,
asjoshi
- SML answers for SML problems,
Don Park
- Re: SML answers for SML problems,
David Megginson
- Re: SML answers for SML problems,
Lauren Wood
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SML answers for SML problems,
Hokkun Pang
- RE: SML answers for SML problems,
Tim Bray
- Re: SML answers for SML problems,
Kragen Sitaker
- Separating documents in a stream,
David Megginson
- Re: Separating documents in a stream,
Richard Anderson
- RE: Separating documents in a stream,
Don Park
- Re: Separating documents in a stream,
Eric Bohlman
- Is the XML decl a PI ?,
Richard Anderson
- The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX),
David Megginson
- Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX),
Liam R. E. Quin
- Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
Richard Anderson
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
David Megginson
- RE: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
Don Park
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
Richard Anderson
- Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :),
David Megginson
- HERE's why the world needs a simpler XML! [was Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)],
Michael Champion
- XML Schema enum and boolean,
Anders W. Tell
- XML and SML,
James Robertson
- XSL patterns give me a node--how can I find it's position?,
Ben Berck
- Offtopic : Eclectic weblog,
Leigh Dodds
- Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Don Park
- RE: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Leigh Dodds
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Michael Champion
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Betty L. Harvey
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
David Megginson
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Ken MacLeod
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Clark C. Evans
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Liam R. E. Quin
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Robert La Quey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Hunter, David
- RE: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Vane Lashua
- RE: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Vane Lashua
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Tim Bray
- Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language),
Tim Bray
| | |
