[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
- To: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>, 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:39:09 -0000
> I am now leaning very heavily toward focusing SML on XML fragments
> so that SML data (the word 'document' is not in the SML draft spec)
> starts with the 'content' production rule of the XML spec. No
> prolog, no misc. SML data have zero or more elements and can be
> entirely text.
I assume you mean the following?
[43] content ::= (element | CharData | Reference | CDSect | PI | Comment)*
So an SML data fragment is not necessarily a valid XML document
as it can be entirely text? And so an XML processor may not be
able to process an SML document? Is that correct?
> May your tire pressure remain constant,
And your mileage never vary :)
L.
==================================================================
"Never Do With More, What Can Be Achieved With Less"
---William of Occam
==================================================================
Leigh Dodds Eml: ldodds@ingenta.com
ingenta ltd Tel: +44 1225 826619
BUCS Building, University of Bath Fax: +44 1225 826283
HomePage : http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccslrd/
WebLog : http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic/
==================================================================
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
