OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: Why do we write standards?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
  • To: xml-dev <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 13:00:25 -0600

I so thorougly agree with your post on the costs and benefits of
standards that I cannot see why we disagree on the fundamental point.
It's worth trying again.

> Since we know so little about mixing HTML into other vocabularies
> right now, 

That's arguable, considering the number of HTMLish languages exist, but
let's pretend I agree.

> and since we know almost nothing about how XML will be used
> in Web clients, I think that it makes sense to start by standardizing
> only a little bit.  

I am all for incremental standardization!

> Let's give people a standard Namespace (and the
> name case) and then let them start experimenting 

This is the part I get lost. Namecase interoperability is not
interesting in the least. The only reason it would be interesting is if
we were trying to achieve other types of interoperability. Normalizing
TABLE and Table to the same spelling is only useful if they really ARE
the same thing. If my <TABLE> can contain <TITLE> and <FOOBAR> and your
<Table> can contain <if> and <blink> then they are fundamentally
different and adopting the same namecase does not help.

This is even more the case for name*space* interoperability. We use the
same namespace to say that we are working interoperably. If we are not
(or may not be) working interoperably then why would we use the same

It's not about socialism versus libertarinism. It's about adopting a
title like "Democratic Republic of Congo" when there is no democracy to
speak of. 

Namespace equivalent: "Product XYZ supports the XHTML namespace. We use
it in completely different ways than anyone else and our software
crashes with many documents that other people create using XHTML, but we
are XHTML namespace compatible!" What's the damn point?

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself

"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be
excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments,
provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."
                         - Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 4

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS