[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@jtauber.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 14:23:21 -0500
> I think it is clear that attributes are needed under
> the 'tradition' view of markup where all character
> data is considered to be 'content'. I think this
> view is just as dangerous and restricting as the
> 'sacred main document structure' view.
Don't get me wrong. I have no problem with dropping attributes in SML. What
I was objecting to in the XML.COM article was the view that attributes were
a mistake in SGML in the first place.
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
