[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@netfolder.com>
- To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 20:44:58 -0500
Hi,
Don Box sent me a very good comment about XML fragment/document linkage to
their schemas.
Comment:
---------
That is one approach discussed in the Schema WG composition task force
report (http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xmlschema-1-19990924/composition-t
f.html). The current schema WD does not specify which (if any) of these
approaches will be used unfortunately.
BTW, overloading the xmlns attribute to locate schema docs would break
a lot of existing XML (most of my xmlns URIs have been UUIDs lately) in
addition to making it more difficult to compare two elements for type
equivalence. I am all for using a well-known XML attribute per element
to associate schema with instances, but I don't think overloading the
existing xmlns attribute is a good idea.
Didier reply:
-------------
Don is right, we have, in the field, several documents using diverse URI for
name space references. things like
URN, URL, etc..
These URI are not necessarily resolvable into a location and a schema
document stored at this place. Thus, we are still in front of the wall: How
to link an XML fragment to its schema?
And in the same vein: how do we link a document to its meta data?
Cheers
Didier PH Martin
mailto:martind@netfolder.com
http://www.netfolder.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|